|
Post by Alena on Dec 27, 2006 11:31:58 GMT -5
PRACTICING ONENESS
Today, I choose to lift the veil and look beyond present circumstances which I had erroneously perceived as lacking.
I release my sense of urgency that I must "fix this" or "do something," relaxing into the deep peace of Spirit.
I look squarely at illusion and choose not to believe it.
I now surrender to the Life Source of pure, unchanging good and willingly receive Divine love, beauty, order, abundance and harmony.
I behold the absolute goodness of God as unlimited Source.
Proclaiming my Divine Inheritance, I accept absolute Oneness with God.
Today, I choose to see through the eyes of God, the eyes of Love, listen for Divine Direction and serve from Oneness.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Feel free to forward your copy to anyone you think might enjoy it. Please keep the entire broadcast intact, including contact and copyright information. Copyright 2000 - 2007, Ann Strong. All rights reserved.
YOUR PRIVACY We do not share your address with anyone, ever.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Ann Strong
2023 East 20th Avenue Denver, CO 80205 US
|
|
|
Post by virtu on Jan 24, 2007 23:20:24 GMT -5
In "oneness" is there an "I" who does all that?
|
|
|
Post by neo on Jan 25, 2007 7:32:10 GMT -5
there is ofcourse a unit that certainly operates.
but the self-mirroring of "I am this and that" is unnecessary waste of energy.
|
|
|
Post by Draco on Feb 1, 2007 17:05:26 GMT -5
In the original context the oneness of god was just alchemy talk for the adept. The word God refers to the person and the oneness is the unification of the person on all levels to perfection.
The Christians and new agey movements "new agey" being xtainity in a mutated form have perverted this meaning into a cheap cheering for slave morality.
|
|
|
Post by Darth Necrom on Feb 3, 2007 14:06:03 GMT -5
Well said again mystic! It is as Karl Marx said religions and gods are only the opiate (or drug) of the masses. It gives the weak a dilluted purpose to carry on their slave-like lives and gives their overlords a sense of devine intervention because of their position in life. The only way to become powerful is to shed all of our human mindsets (religion being the largest) and think outside of the box for once.
|
|
|
Post by Alena on Feb 3, 2007 14:55:07 GMT -5
Well said again mystic! It is as Karl Marx said religions and gods are only the opiate (or drug) of the masses. It gives the weak a dilluted purpose to carry on their slave-like lives and gives their overlords a sense of devine intervention because of their position in life. The only way to become powerful is to shed all of our human mindsets (religion being the largest) and think outside of the box for once. I agree in regards to religion. I do not see religion as the same thing as spirituality, and too often people get so caught up in the religion that they worship IT and pay little reverance for the divine in the world and in themselves. ~Alena
|
|
|
Post by Darth Necrom on Feb 3, 2007 16:56:03 GMT -5
Yes it could be said that I am a very spiritual person. As for religious... not so much.
|
|
|
Post by Draco on Feb 3, 2007 21:38:11 GMT -5
Yes I agree religion is opiate for the masses and karl marx is the opiate of the marxist materialists. The ironic part is all the very ancient religions where different they where a science of the mind, body and soul and how to holistically balance and evolve them. They originally where not very concerned with morality as it was understood as the individual evolves they will naturally understand and abide by the truth that resides in their own heart. The ancient religions aim was the creation of the Overman. Bhatki, ritualisms are a later on condition that was understood would arise in the kali Yuga.
|
|
|
Post by Alena on Feb 3, 2007 23:47:31 GMT -5
Bhatki, ritualisms are a later on condition that was understood would arise in the kali Yuga. I like the concept of bhakti yoga myself. ~Alena
|
|
|
Post by Draco on Feb 4, 2007 0:02:17 GMT -5
Yes, but bhakti has been used out of balance, a part of a greater art, but not the whole on it's own. Bhatki, ritualisms are a later on condition that was understood would arise in the kali Yuga. I like the concept of bhakti yoga myself. ~Alena
|
|
|
Post by Alena on Feb 4, 2007 12:38:55 GMT -5
Yes, but bhakti has been used out of balance, a part of a greater art, but not the whole on it's own. Out of balance in what sense? ~Alena
|
|
|
Post by Darth Necrom on Feb 4, 2007 13:14:33 GMT -5
Yes modern religions and all of their supposed good deeds have actually set us back as a society. Much like political parties.
|
|
|
Post by Draco on Feb 4, 2007 22:05:21 GMT -5
In the sense of a car missing 3 wheels . Yes, but bhakti has been used out of balance, a part of a greater art, but not the whole on it's own. Out of balance in what sense? ~Alena
|
|
|
Post by setiishadim on Feb 6, 2007 17:12:45 GMT -5
In the sense of a car missing 3 wheels . Out of balance in what sense? ~Alena Mystic, you are speaking in generalities. Could you state specifically how Bhakti yoga is out of balance?
|
|
|
Post by Lord competent. on Feb 9, 2016 0:28:24 GMT -5
The times for my on is to be in my force in it to provide.
|
|